3 min read
There are books we love, books we admire, books we endure. And then there are books that do something else entirely—they rearrange us from the inside out. They disturb our sense of who we are, shift how we see the world, unsettle what we believe to be true. These books don't just occupy our shelves; they colonize our thoughts, altering our internal architecture in ways we may not recognize until years later.
But here's the question that matters: Would you actually let a book change you? Not just impress you, or move you, or give you something clever to quote at dinner parties—but fundamentally alter the way you exist in the world?
Most of us can name the books that have marked us. Perhaps you read The Bell Jar as a teenager and suddenly saw your own contradictions reflected back—the quiet rage, the suffocating loneliness, the unbearable weight of others' expectations. Or you encountered Camus' The Myth of Sisyphus at precisely the moment when life felt absurd, and instead of despair, you discovered something like defiant joy in his vision of the "happy" Sisyphus, eternally pushing his boulder up the mountain.
Some books make us see the world differently. Others—the dangerous ones—make us see ourselves differently, which is infinitely harder to shake off. Simone de Beauvoir's The Second Sex doesn't merely describe women's oppression; it forces every reader to examine their own complicity in perpetuating it. Mishima's Confessions of a Mask doesn't simply portray hidden desires; it confronts us with our own carefully constructed facades. These books refuse to let you remain neutral.
And that's precisely where the discomfort begins.
We love the idea of transformation. We speak endlessly about growth, evolution, "becoming our best selves." But genuine change? That's unsettling. It's far more comfortable to treat books as entertainment or intellectual exercises rather than catalysts for personal upheaval.
Sometimes we resist a book's impact without even realizing it. We read, we admire, but we maintain a careful distance. We reduce profound insights to "interesting ideas" instead of recognizing them as calls to action. Orwell's 1984 might sharpen our cynicism about surveillance, but do we actually modify our digital behaviors because of it? Baldwin's The Fire Next Time might shake us profoundly, but do we allow it to genuinely shift our understanding of privilege, of history, of our own complicity in systems of oppression?
It's infinitely easier to intellectualize a book than to let it implicate us. Because once a book truly changes you—really changes you—there's no returning to who you were before.
There's a moment that happens sometimes while reading—a flash of recognition so sharp it feels almost invasive. A sentence or passage stops you cold because it's exposing something you hadn't fully acknowledged about yourself. A hidden truth. A desire you've been avoiding. A fear you didn't want to name.
These are the moments that haunt us long after we've closed the book. And they present us with a choice: Do we look away? Or do we let the book complete its work on us?
Writers often claim that literature holds up a mirror to life. But we forget that mirrors aren't always flattering. Some books show us exactly who we are—and we don't always like what we see staring back.
So would you let a book change you? Not in that comfortable way where you finish reading and feel slightly wiser, slightly more cultured. But in the way that demands you make different choices? Forces you to see people differently? Compels you to acknowledge a part of yourself you were pretending didn't exist?
Books possess that power—if we're brave enough to grant it to them. The question isn't whether they can change us. The question is whether we want them to.
Some books you read. Some books read you. The ones that matter most do both simultaneously.
And once they're done with you, you'll never be quite the same person who first opened their pages.
Comments will be approved before showing up.
4 min read
Desire, power, and control — Yukio Mishima lived inside the obsessions that filled his novels. In Eikoh Hosoe’s Ordeal by Roses, Mishima becomes his own creation: bound, mythologized, consumed. But who, in the end, held the power?
5 min read
Simone de Beauvoir, Jack Kerouac, Yukio Mishima, and others didn’t just write—they redefined culture. Their ideas on feminism, rebellion, aesthetics, and the unconscious continue to shape literature, art, and contemporary thought.
5 min read
Literary history often favors the neatly canonized, but true innovation comes from those who disrupt and defy conventions. They are the writers who pushed boundaries—challenging norms, reshaping genres, and influencing generations while remaining on the fringes. From Pauline Réage’s subversive eroticism to Joris-Karl Huysman's restless decadent descriptions of the artifice, these rebels remind us that literature thrives on rebellion.
NEWSLETTER
Want £10 towards a full-size perfume?
Every once in a while we send email updates on things we think you’d like to know about such as new products, interesting articles written about the things that inspire, promos and sensory events.